WHO Releases Information to ‘Combating Misinformation’

WHO Releases Guide to ‘Combating Misinformation’

You may sleep simple tonight. The World Well being Group introduced that it’s working with Large Tech to fight misinformation on-line. It didn’t outline what “misinformation” it’s focusing on, and even what “misinformation” is, however in the event you see something that appears suspicious, WHO desires you to report it immediately so social media platforms can flag it or take it down.1

Sound disturbing? Extra like a nightmare, but it surely’s one that’s, sadly, not a dream. As John Campbell, a retired nurse and trainer primarily based in England, stated within the video above, “It’s virtually as in the event that they need to have an affect over all elements of social media.”2 Sure, certainly, and so they’re fairly open about it too. WHO states that it’s “altering social media coverage and pointers,” and:3

“WHO works with social media coverage departments to make sure firm coverage and pointers for content material suppliers are match for function. For instance, WHO labored with YouTube to boost their COVID-19 Misinformation Coverage and supply pointers for content material suppliers to make sure no medical misinformation associated to the virus proliferates on their platform.”

Practically 1 Million YouTube Movies Taken Down

On account of WHO’s “coverage updates,” 850,000 YouTube movies associated to “dangerous or deceptive COVID-19 misinformation” have been faraway from the platform from February 2020 to January 2021.4 As justification for its rampant censorship, WHO explains:5

“WHO and companions acknowledge that misinformation on-line has the potential to journey additional, quicker and typically deeper than the reality — on some social media platforms, falsehoods are 70% extra prone to get shared than correct information. To counter this, WHO has taken a variety of actions with tech corporations to stay one step forward.”

Lest you see all sides of a problem and type an informed opinion of your personal, WHO intends to fastidiously management the web so that you solely see what it deems because the “fact.” And it’s working intently, “on a weekly foundation,” in reality, with grasp manipulators in their very own proper, together with YouTube, Google, Fb and “a number of different companions reminiscent of NewsGuard …”6

Ah sure, NewsGuard, one other self-appointed web watchdog that sells a browser plugin to price web sites on 9 standards of credibility and transparency. NewsGuard obtained a lot of its startup funds from Publicis Groupe, a large international communications group with divisions that model imaging, design of digital enterprise platforms, media relations and well being care.

Publicis Groupe’s well being subsidiary, Publicis Well being, names Lilly, Abbot, Roche, Amgen, Genentech, Celgene, Gilead, Biogen, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, Bayer and different Large Pharma giants as purchasers. The truth is, the PR agency that created and ran Purdue Pharma’s misleading advertising and marketing campaigns for the opioid Oxycontin is none apart from Publicis.

Originally of Could 2021, the Massachusetts legal professional normal filed a lawsuit7 towards Publicis Well being, accusing the Publicis subsidiary of serving to Purdue create the misleading advertising and marketing supplies used to mislead medical doctors into prescribing OxyContin. We’re taking place a rabbit gap, however you realize you possibly can inform so much about a corporation by who its associates are.

‘Defend Your self and Others’ — Report ‘Misinformation’

WHO can be enlisting the assistance of mainly anybody who will pay attention and fall for his or her blatant propaganda to report “misinformation” about COVID-19 and COVID-19 pictures that goes towards its insurance policies. In accordance with WHO:8

“Social media platforms have … granted WHO entry to quick monitor reporting methods, which permits us to flag misinformation on their platforms, rushing up the reporting and removing of content material that breaks coverage. WHO additionally works with Member States such because the Authorities of the UK to lift consciousness of misinformation round COVID-19 and vaccines, and encourage people to report false or deceptive content material on-line.”

Conveniently, WHO has taken the guesswork out of how one can report stated misinformation. They’ve devoted a webpage to reporting misinformation on-line, with direct hyperlinks to the next social media platforms, making it simple to snitch on those that go towards the established order:9











WHO’s Transfer to Create a International Superpower

WHO gained’t cease at controlling the web. It’s additionally aiming to “save the world” from infectious ailments, meals system failures and extra by making a globalist group with synchronized plans — and the potential for final management and energy.

This was revealed in October 2022, when WHO introduced a brand new initiative referred to as One Well being Joint Plan of Motion. The plan was launched by the Quadripartite which, along with WHO, consists of the:10

  • Meals and Agriculture Group of the United Nations (FAO)
  • United Nations Surroundings Programme (UNEP)
  • World Organisation for Animal Well being (WOAH, based as OIE)

WHO already has an excessive amount of energy. This new initiative will solely give it extra. It’s essential to grasp that Invoice Gates is WHO’s No. 1 funder, contributing extra to WHO’s $4.84 billion biennial funds11 — by way of a number of avenues together with the Invoice & Melinda Gates Basis in addition to GAVI, which was based by the Gates Basis in partnership with WHO, the World Financial institution and numerous vaccine producers — than any member-state authorities. Briefly, Invoice Gates is basically the proprietor of WHO.

Regulatory Companies Captured by Business

In 1992, the Prescription Drug Consumer Price Act (PDUFA) was created, which permits the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration to gather charges from the drug business. “With the act, the FDA moved from a completely taxpayer-funded entity to at least one supplemented by business cash,” a BMJ article written by investigative journalist Maryanne Demasi explains.12

Now, important parts of regulatory companies’ budgets come from the pharmaceutical business that these companies are supposed to manage. In 1993, after PDUFA was handed, the FDA collected about $29 million in web PDUFA charges. This elevated 30-fold — to $884 million — by 2016.13

It’s additionally revealing, as famous by Campbell, that on the FDA, 9 out of 10 of its former commissioners between 2006 and 2019 went on to work for pharmaceutical corporations.14 However it’s not solely U.S. regulators who’re captured by business; the same pattern occurred in Europe. In 1995, business charges funded 20% of the European Medicines Company (EMA). This rose to 75% by 2010 and now, in 2022, it’s 89%. In accordance with Demasi:15

“In 2005 within the UK, the Home of Commons’ well being committee evaluated the affect of the drug business on well being coverage, together with the Medicines and Healthcare Merchandise Regulatory Company (MHRA).

The committee was involved that business funding may lead the company to ‘lose sight of the necessity to shield and promote public well being above all else because it seeks to win charge earnings from the businesses.’ However almost 20 years on, little has modified, and business funding of drug regulators has turn into the worldwide norm.”

How do regulators from completely different nations examine? “Business cash permeates the globe’s main regulators,” Demasi wrote, demonstrated as follows:16

Australia’s Therapeutic Items Administration — 96% of funds derived from business

Europe’s EMA — 89%

U.Okay.’s MHRA — 86%

Japan’s Prescription drugs and Medical Gadgets Company — 85%

U.S. FDA — 65%

Well being Canada — 50.5%

“Are these the official our bodies that we need to adjudicate over what well being info we’re given, over which medication are good for us and which medication are dangerous for us?” Campbell stated. “Is that this actually who we need to make these selections, given the quantity of funding they’re receiving from, what some individuals may think about to be, vested pursuits?”17

“We’re speaking about giant quantities of cash, which haven’t any affect on decision-making,” he says sarcastically. “And but these official companies are going to determine what well being info you and I are going to obtain.”18

Are We Dwelling Out an Orwellian Actuality?

Entry to info because it as soon as was has been essentially modified. WHO and different world leaders at the moment are working collectively to silence info that doesn’t correspond with its frequent agenda. Even info that was as soon as reality, reminiscent of definitions in dictionaries and on official authorities web sites, have been altered in actual time.

Examples of definitions which were modified embrace these for pandemic, herd immunity, vaccines and anti-vaxxer. Investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson is amongst those that have defined that just about every little thing you see and listen to on-line has been coopted, or taken over to serve a better agenda. Attkisson reiterates:19

“Just about each type of info and sourcing that may be coopted has been. That features the dictionary definitions, that features every little thing as a result of these are essential methods to affect thought. Language may be very highly effective. Individuals don’t need to be affiliated with sure names and labels.

It jogs my memory of 1984, the George Orwell story in regards to the futuristic society, below which historical past was being rewritten in actual time to jive with the model that the federal government needed or the occasion needed it to be. Definitions now are being rewritten and adjusted in actual time to suit with the imaginative and prescient that the institution desires individuals to suppose.”

Campbell additionally quotes “1984,” which said, “It was anticipated that Newspeak would have lastly outdated Oldspeak (or Normal English, as we should always name it) by in regards to the 12 months 2050.”20 “Let’s hope it doesn’t get there earlier than that,” Campbell stated. “I type of like Oldspeak. It’s the one I used to be introduced up with.”

Orwell wrote, “The aim of Newspeak was not solely to offer a medium of expression for the world-view and psychological habits correct to the devotees of Ingsoc [the ruling party], however to make all different modes of thought unattainable.”21

“The C vocabulary [a component of Newspeak] was supplementary to the others and consisted solely of scientific and technical phrases. These resembled the scientific phrases in use immediately, and have been constructed from the identical roots, however the ordinary care was taken to outline them rigidly and strip them of undesirable meanings.”22

After which there are the three slogans, “Battle is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is energy,” that are contradictory but extensively accepted by the individuals. It’s meals for thought, as WHO and different regulatory companies turn into more and more blatant of their censorship and suppression of freedom. “Make of that what you’ll,” Campbell says.